ofek logo

More articles in the Issue

Issue #1 – October 2021

Digital KavOFEK #1

Editorial

We are delighted to launch the first digital issue of KAV OFEK.

In September 2000, the first issue of KAV OFEK was published.Avi Nutkevitch, who was the chairman of OFEK at the time, wrote, among other things, in his words of blessing:

“OFEK Writes” is of course another way to promote ideas, but it is primarily the creation of a space for the production of new ideas, for new conceptualizations, for further processing of experiences; It is another way to channel creativity; It is also another channel of communication between us and ourselves, between us and the world.”

Silvia Silberman and Ilana Litvin wrote in the editorial: After debates that ranged from excessive modesty to grandiose ambition, between the intention to publish a “dry” informative page and the desire to create a polished professional journal, the members of the committee decided to launch a journal that would encourage experiential and spontaneous writing even by those of us who shy away from writing for the established professional press.

The journal was published every year; grew, developed and expanded, and the members of its board also changed over the years. In December 2011, issue No. 12 was released, which was also the last. Since then, it fell asleep for ten years. The image of “Sleeping Beauty” waiting for the prince to come, give her a kiss, and wake her up from her slumber came up in the system.

The first thoughts about renewing KAV OFEK in a digital format, with the encouragement of OFEK’s board, came up over two years ago, even before the outbreak of COVID, and began with meetings between Sivanie Shiran and Yermi Harel. Sivanie was obliged to retire and a new editorial board was established which includes Eliat Aram, Yermi Harel and Shelly Sussman: on the editorial team of the first issues, on the editorial team of the middle issues and a newcomer to the board, respectively, hoping for a combination of old and new, tradition and innovation, an important issue in itself, in the field of group relations.

The theme of the issue, which turns the gaze to organization and organizing during the days of an epidemic, invites consideration of the effects of the epidemic on the new system that formed during this period. The digital acceleration in the days of Corona and the transformative change in the perception of location and space, removed limitations on a global society, which became “natural”. The technological tools also became “natural”, and the editors were helped by the available technology of Zoom, WhatsApp, email and shared files for the day-to-day work and communication with the article writers and other people who took part and helped in the production of the issue. Plans for an editorial meeting in Israel were canceled with the imposition of the lockdowns and movement restrictions, so that in fact, like many teams during this period, the editorial board operated in the online space and did not meet physically from its establishment and throughout the period of work on the magazine.

The Corona epidemic gave renewed validity to renewing the journal in an online format, one that is accessible and available beyond the boundaries of time, space and language, and invites expression in a variety of media and styles, such as video and visual images. As in the previous links in the KAV OFEK chain, in the renewed digital edition the wish is to provide a creative and playful space for engaging in the areas of OFEK’s knowledge, a space for conceptual and experiential expression, for collecting and processing experiences and for communication within the community of members and between it and the world.

This task is part of the contemporary challenge of searching for alternative ways and additional channels for meeting and dialogue. For example, KAV OFEK’s digital platform allows comments on the article page, as a channel of this type. Is it possible to think of a “hybrid model” in OFEK, which has some physical meetings, some online meetings and some on the online KAV OFEK? Time will tell.

The first part of the issue contains three articles dealing, from different angles, with the learning experience from online conferences or meetings about conferences. They all took place during the months of the epidemic. We opened with an piece by Ronit Kark and Miriam Shapira examining their experience as participants in the pioneer eGRC conference in 2020. The central theme, around the question or the feeling of omitting intimacy in a conference with digital authority, immediately stimulated thoughts in the editorial board and indeed we included a comment on the subject of omission by Yermi Harel.

The second piece is actually a collection of contributions from the director, staff members and participants of the online conference that took place in February 2021 and to which an OFEK evening was dedicated in June of this year, led by Smadar Ashuach and Amir Scharf, the content of which can be found here.

This part of the issue is concluded with a meta-learning article about learning from conferences through a series of Zoom meetings. The article was edited by Mira Erlich-Ginor who conducted three OFEK evenings on Zoom in the fall of 2020, between the waves of the Corona virus, with the primary task – learning from conferences. The second part of the issue also contains three articles, which deal with the question we presented in the call for proposals about OFEK as a host organization and the experience of leadership in its various shades and colors during the epidemic years.

We start with chairperson Yael Shenhav Sharoni’s view on the management of OFEK – the organization as an organization – in times of epidemic, physical distance and uncertainty.

We continue with a thoughtful article from an OFEK member, Gabi Bonwitt, about the group of OFEK members that examined group relations and Corona, in which he touches on issues we will return to later – memory, otherness and foreignness.

We conclude with the contribution of Leslie Brissett, director of the program for group relations at the Tavistock Institute London, who also sent an article thinking about identity, belonging and the digital experience in the days of an epidemic from his point of view as a director. This article also provoked deep reactions among the members of the editorial board and here you will find Shelly Sussman’s response to the idea of “a person in a body”.

The third and last part of the issue is dedicated to the memory of our dear friend Judy Levy who passed away prematurely before the epidemic. The memorial evening for her death in August 2019 at Yigal Ginat’s house in Jerusalem is perhaps one of the last memories before the epidemic of OFEK members getting together, talking, crying, remembering and singing Judy.

Here you will find a collection of interviews, some recorded, some written, of friends who remember Judy; Judy’s original article from 2011, “Memory Lost and Memory Found”, with her original response and with a contemporary addition from Gabriella Braun, a memory wrapped in sensitive, responsible and loving editing by Leila Djemal and Miri Tzadok.

It seems to us that maybe Judy is our sleeping beauty, helping us wake up and wake KAV OFEK. Although unlike in fairy tales, we cannot bring her back to breathe within us, we can try and carry on as she breathes from our memories.

We hope you enjoy the issue and that its various “kisses and caresses” will inspire you to contribute in the future.

The Editors,

Shelly, Yermi and Eliat
September 2021

* The editors would like to thank first and foremost, Ilan Kirschenbaum, for his partnership and assistance in the realization of the digital edition.

* To OFEK’s board, which approved funds that helped in the realization of the issue, especially in the editing of the recorded segments.

* And of course. to all the writers and contributors – there is no journal without content.

Issue #2 – November 2022

Digital Kav OFEK#2

Editorial

We are delighted to put forward Kav OFEK’s 2022 – the second digital edition. In preparing this edition, we could identify characteristics of doing something for the ‘second time’. In the second edition of Kav Ofek in-print, in 2001, Ilana Litvin, Silvia Silberman and Eliat Aram, the then editors, wrote:
“we are all familiar with the burst of energy that comes with beginnings, with a genesis. It is much harder to generate energy in order to persevere in creating and invest in maintenance”.

These similar feelings, that accompanied the preparation of the second edition echoed the title: “on longing, movement and nevertheless”. Inspired by the famous lyrics* pointing to the “ongoing journey” and the necessity to relentlessly “keep on moving”, we have wondered – what is the meaning of ‘movement’ these days, when the journey seems to go on and on, regresses, comes to a stand-still – how do individuals, groups, organisations, societies, communities move? Where do longing for human touch and closeness meet movement and moving? Where do we find the resources to keep on moving nevertheless and despite it all?**

We have recognised the circularity of movement in OFEK in the very recent GRC which took place with TAU entitled “Being a Therapist at this time” under the leadership of Yosi Triest and Moshe Bergstein. The GRC was cancelled twice during the pandemic, the journey extended, and eventually it happened this last September with a significant number of participants. What has been the place of longing, perseverance, determination, in the success of this GRC, despite it all and nevertheless?

The articles in this edition are also characterised by the circular movement of back and forth. The first cluster includes two articles dealing with insights from the Corona years, and relate to loneliness, movement and stuckness. First, a thought piece from Shmuel Bernstein dealing with loneliness and lack of movement, and – through re-examining Baudelaire’s La Solitude- offers a new perspective to think of the “empty space”. In the second thought piece, Simon Western touches on questions of loneliness, isolation and melancholy in the digital age, and discusses them through a case study of drone pilots in the USA air force.

The second cluster includes three articles emerging directly from OFEK-related activities and Group Relations thinking. The first, by Hagit Shachar-Paraira and Eyal Etzioni, examines sensitively and from the perspective of the participant, the processes in a reading group of systemic-psychoanalytic papers, which took place over a period of four years (including during covid and lockdown and a return to in-person), suggesting a relationship between learning/study and food/feeding. In the paper “tears of an administrator” which also deals with the experience of participating, Ori Weyl shares his experience of being a GRC administrator this past July with a touching humorous style. This section concludes with a thought piece from Gilad Ovadia which examines the addition of a fourth T boundary, in addition to the original three of Task, Territory and Time. He suggests that of reality Testing, which contributes the strengthening of movement between the ideal and the real in organisational work.

This edition is sealed with the contributions of two guest writers, asking us – “moving – where to?”
Gili Yuval, poet and writer dealing with the world of work, points to the tension between loneliness and a road-trip type movement, to the longing for solitude and suggests a ‘solution’ of a journey-to-nowhere.
Coreene Archer’s thought piece responds to the ancient song “keep moving on the ongoing journey” with contemporary voices and songs and challenges us to examine for ourselves questions of choice and internal listening.

Happy reading and please do use the comment boxes to share your reflections, questions and thoughts.

The Editors,

Yermi, Eliat and Shely
November 2022
* “Ze Kore” (It Happens) / Lyrics Shmulik Kraus
** Call for Papers Kav OFEK #2

Dramatic Road

Singing nevertheless

Coreene Archer

In the world of modern consultancy there seems to be an increasing need for models and tools. Working with different clients from different sectors, I am regularly asked to recommend a model or a tool to support or guide their learning or thinking. Not unreasonable you might say, and I agree, but it provokes me to wonder if – following the disruption of the pandemic – there is an increased need for security? One of the key principles of the Tavistock Approach is recognition that uncertainty provokes anxiety, and we search for different ways to manage or control the feelings that are mobilised. Having a lens or a frame can – for some people – create the feeling that they are able to make sense of circumstances around them – that there is a right way to look or to understand the world.

Each day, the spectre or presence of our personal or collective history can be a light weight or a heavy burden to carry as we continually assess our place- or position – in society. The perspective we take changes depending on which part of our identity or role is active. The shifting lens of what we see or understand changes all the time as we transition and translate our view from one situation to another.

Even this call for papers came in two languages, translated to broaden the range of perspectives that could be included, the voices that would be heard. We were invited to respond to the voices of our elders, those encouraging us to “go on nevertheless”. My response to this was to ponder “Who is singing?” “What is the song?” and most importantly “Where are we going?” In this paper I will seek to answer these three questions.

Who is singing?

The first voice that I hear is Maya Angelou. The African American memoirist, popular poet, and civil rights activist wrote the poem, “I know why the caged bird sings”. In this poem, Angelou turns her lens onto the issue of freedom and the piece is written as a reflection on the impact of slavery and the state of race relations at that time. She opens the poem describing the movement of the birds as they “leap” freely and catch the wind signalling the joy of being able to go where the wind blows you. An expression of the freedom of choice. The story of the caged bird is a different one, the description is of the emotions it exudes. Its rage creates blindness as it recognises its restrictions, and that the only way to escape – is to sing. It is an expression of core identity, an act of rebellion, it is the sound of freedom.

During the pandemic, we all had an experience of being “caged” with our movements restricted, and for some people the reaction was rage. We saw glimpses of rage in the demonstrations against vaccination and as an impact of the Black Lives Matters movement. We were restricted in our work and in social spaces. The delivery of programmes, consultancy, and group relations conferences all moved online, changing our relationship with work, with time and with space. Everything was condensed and the legacy of these experiences continues to linger as society seems to be hankering for how things were, but somewhat unwilling to let go of some of the benefits of being at home. There was a change in the atmosphere as the world became still, and the evidence of “singing” was seen in nature with the reports of dolphins and fish in the Venetian canals. Due to the high death toll and the levels of anxiety that permeated the news, it has been less easy to identify the positive impact on humans – which was seen only in the translation process of our working lives and rhythms, and the initial access to longed for rest.

At the heart of Maya Angelou’s poem is the question of identity and the freedom to express desires and choices that are held dear. Questions of identity continue to be asked, and even though there is some recognition of the fluid quality of the way we understand and relate to the concept of identity, it is clear that it relates directly to social context and the way individuals choose to “show up”, the relatedness of role and how that affects who we choose to be. Identity shifts within each of us in a different way.

What is the song?

A new voice that I have tuned into, is the voice of Charisse Jones, journalist and national correspondent for USA Today and her colleague Kumea Shorter-Gooden, a psychologist and professor at Alliant University. Drawing on data gathered from the African American’s Voices Project, they explore and reflect on the nature and impact of code shifting amongst black professional women. Shifting is a concept that they introduce to describe the need for an individual to adapt their behaviour to fit to the corporate world. This behaviour is particularly recognisable amongst professionals from an ethnic minority background but may also be recognisable amongst professionals who fall outside the boundaries of privilege and are “othered”.

The internal need or desire to adjust our behaviour or another aspect of our identity, is a process that happens at an unconscious level. This response usually happens in moments of stress or exposure. Amongst “othered” professionals, the ability to be able to identify this reaction in themselves could be a helpful way of releasing affected individuals from being mobilised into behaving differently, or at least to understand at a deeper level the contexts that provoke the reaction. The notion of shifting roles is a familiar one in organisational life, as we regularly move between leading and following. One of the tools we use to explore the fluidity and shifting nature of identity is the Ladder of Intersectionality© 1.

The Ladder of Intersectionality draws on the work of Kimberley Crenshaw, an American civil rights advocate and a leading scholar of critical race theory. Crenshaw is also a professor at the UCLA School of Law and Columbia Law School, where she specializes in race and gender issues. The formulation of the concept of intersectionality is based on the identification of a collision between gender and race in a case of law. It is the understanding that the intersectional experience is greater than the sum of its parts – racism and sexism – rather it is the multiple impact of the overlapping of the experience in both policy and law.

The theory is based on three lawsuits brought by black women to challenge the way that they are seen and understood in society. The first lawsuit is based on several claims brought against General Motors who were separately challenged on their employment of black women first on the factory floor and then in the office. General Motors were able to defend the case by citing firstly their employment of black men on the factory floor as evidence that there was no race discrimination, and their employment of white women as evidence that there was no gender discrimination. Therefore, the experience of one group (the black women) was defined by the experience of two other groups experience.

The purpose of the Ladder of Intersectionality is to help those who use it to consider how the different aspects of their identity also intersect and are overlapping. It is based on the idea that everyone has an internal hierarchy which alters depending on the context we are in, our comfort level and whether any defence mechanisms are active, altering our behaviours and responses in professional contexts.

Melanie Klein reminds us that infants are so intrinsically linked with their mother that the ability to distinguish “Me and Not Me” – and it could be suggested that the search for clarity, separation and wholeness – continues throughout our lives, and is a core element in the development and formation of identity.

In her paper ‘Leadership; A Song of Mentoring and Power’, Beverly Malone (2012) reminds us of two core elements required to demonstrate aspects of leadership that also align with our sense of identity. Malone suggests that leaders are dreamers and states “they are always looking down the road past their own personal obstacles sometimes determined by the present exclusive culture of their world… especially those balancing a number of responsibilities including children, school and work, for example, dreaming is a luxury or an underdeveloped talent. It takes permission and time to dream.”

There is a strong alignment between the dreamer and the caged bird as both are thinking about a new future and how to be in it. The concept of the dreamer is not a new one in the Tavistock Approach and is embedded in psychoanalytic thinking and methodologies, particularly in the concept of social dreaming that expands the idea of a dream and what it tells us about the context. The idea of the singer is newer, and creates an interesting link to the concept of voice – who speaks, who is heard and what is listened to.

The second core element is mastery, which could also be described as professionalism. Malone states “Mastery holds the concept of overcoming or of coming into one’s own abilities, talents and skills. The acknowledgment of this accomplishment may be a position, an award or an academic credential that tends to be as universally transferable as the US currency once was. Leaders need to acknowledge their need for mastery. This ability to humble oneself into the learner role is important. The pursuit of mastery indicates that there is a gap and work yet to be done”

Malone highlights the development opportunity that comes within the learning space, but also there comes a point when the learner has acquired the knowledge and at that point can stand alone to go on and develop new thoughts and ideas, a step that also requires a leap of faith.

Where are we going?

When listening to the voices of our elders, there is an art to hearing what is said and what is not said. The guidance that helps the navigation of difficult terrains, complex organisational systems, dynamics and rules. There are so many voices to listen to, those that encourage us to keep going, and those who like the parents of toddlers, are fearful of the risk taking required for the child to flourish because of the embedded challenge or danger in the process.

For most systems, there is the challenge of the many voices that speak. Some voices make valid points, others are less effective. Ultimately, there can be only one, the internal voice that we choose to hear or ignore, the external voices can encourage, or guide, or dissuade us from taking the next step, speaking up or out. Whether that voice organisationally is a leader/CEO or Chairperson, or personally a partner, parent or elder, we choose. McRae and Short remind us that there is a paradox to involvement and withdrawal, which they state is characterised by “detachment, observation and experience” and is part of any individual’s ability to be part of a group, seeking belonging and equally afraid of being overtaken or engulfed. Once again, we are faced with anxiety.

What then do we do when faced with the voices of our elders and the circularity of the never-ending road? The cultural theorist Stuart Hall (2017) suggests “the task… is not to think as we always did, keeping the faith by trying to hold the terrain together through an act of compulsive will, but to learn to think differently”.

1 The ladder of Intersectionality© was developed by Coreene Archer at the TIHR in 2018.

Photo by Karsten Würth on Unsplash

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *